the online meeting place for all who love our amphibians and reptiles |
|
Refugia Survey |
Post Reply | Page 123 6> |
Author | |
Vicar
Senior Member Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1184 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 14 Oct 2004 at 1:11am |
Does anybody have any guidance on the appropriate spacing of refugia on uniform heathland ? Aim of the survey is to determine the presence of species, not population densities. Each site would be approx 25 hectares with a perimeter of around 2000m. Apart from the usual issues of placement, permissions and situation away from the public gaze, I can't find any work on 'optimal' spacing of tins on uniform terrain. 16 tins over this area would give me about 100m separation - roughly. All comments gladly received. Edited by Vicar |
|
calumma
Senior Member Joined: 27 Jun 2003 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 375 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
If all you are trying to achieve is assess likely presence, I don't think that spacing really matters. Current Froglife guidelines recommend no more than 10 tins per ha. What really matters is placing each cover object in such a position that you maximise the chances of recording all of the species that are likely to occupy the site.
Lee |
|
administrator
Admin Group Joined: 01 Jan 2007 Status: Offline Points: 10 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Steve, 16 tins would be a little low in my guestimation for a 60 acre site even for presence absence. I would suggest 30 would be nearer the mark. Multiples of five also make analysis easier later on. In particular if you have a fairly featureless area it is more difficult to optimise a presence/absence study, compared to a site with obvious margins, banks, etc so you may want to compensate by going for even more tins. Lee, Doesn't the Froglife guidline of no more than 10 tins per hectare relate to relative population estimates, not presence/likely absence studies? Edited by administrator |
|
calumma
Senior Member Joined: 27 Jun 2003 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 375 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Gemma, it does - but it's still an attempt at standardising effort. The point I was trying to make was that if the site is 25 ha and you are following Froglife's guidelines there really should be 25 x 10 = 250 tins. So I agree that 16 tins is somewhat low. If a small number of refugia are to be used then spacing between tins simply isn't relevant. Far more important to place each cover object in an optimum position.
|
|
administrator
Admin Group Joined: 01 Jan 2007 Status: Offline Points: 10 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yep see your point Lee. Steve, I think what Lee and I are both getting at is that one wouldn't evenly distribute the tins across the site with uniform spacing but would be more likely to bunch them in likely positions. With a density of 10 per hectare you could reasonable cover the entire site with tins at even spacing. With a much lower density you have to optimise to where animals are 'likely' to use the refugia. Lee pretty much taught me how to place refugia and I would recommend it is worth getting out to a site with an experienced recorded and seeing how refugia survey is set-up before going it alone. It takes a little experience to realise that what appears to be fairly uniform habitat to our eyes is featured to a reptile sometimes! Edited by administrator |
|
Vicar
Senior Member Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1184 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Fair enough, I'll base the proposal for numbers on an estimate of the time taken to combine checking the refugia with a belt-transect visual encounter survey (walking between tins :P) for a 2-hour site visit.
|
|
Vicar
Senior Member Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1184 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
OOps, I must have been typing as Gemma was :P Basically I'm writing up a proposal/plan over the winter, with an aim of having a final draft by Xmas, which gives me the new year to co-ordinate with the various bodies/orgs. Having started to write it up, its already looking quite the daunting prospect !, but there is a logic to the scale, driven by the goals. Having said that, even if nothing comes of the plan, I'm already finding it of vital experience. Part of the process would involve what I call IPB, but basically inteligence preparation, site survey, identifying likely micro-habitat, extant records etc. What would be REALLY helpful, would be a look over of what I am proposing (plan review) by persons far more experienced than myself (not too hard to find :P). Doubt I'll have a first draft ready until the end of the month tho. |
|
frogworlduk
Senior Member Joined: 19 Aug 2003 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 73 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
what was the outcome of this? looking to place down some tins for presence/absence. was thinking some where along the lines of 30-40 on a 70 hectare site. sound about right?
|
|
Vicar
Senior Member Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1184 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
OOh...
Lots of research on this since the original post! Depends upon your habitat assessment. We've settled on a grid matrix of 1 tin per hectare for large area survey. Draft tin position is the middle of each hectare grid that has habitat suitable for reptile occupancy. Final position is the best assessed micro-habitat within 10m of that location (or a bit further if the micro-habitat is really bad). The only trouble with bunching tins is that you tend to cluster tins on where you consider the best reptile habitat is. Unfortunately, even with lots of experience, the reptiles' view of what is the best habitat varies from ours! - The reason why people get so confident about 'good' reptile habitat is that few look hard in areas they consider poor habitat, so they re-inforce their intuition. Having adopted the grid approach, we regularly find animals in habitat that amazes me. Smooth snakes regularly turning up in 2-inch heather! Also, the grid system gives you a much more efficient means of determining site-wide distribution. So, for a 70 Ha site with all good reptile habitat, I'd say 70 tins. If half of the habitat is clearly unsuitable (whatever that means!), then half the number of tins. If you end up with 70 tins, I'd suggest divide the site into 2 sub-sites. At those densities, with good visual survey effort between tins, I'd allow 1hr survey per 10 tins. 7 hours is a bit of a stint, even for me, so divide into zones and survey separately would be my advice. Steve Edited by Vicar |
|
frogworlduk
Senior Member Joined: 19 Aug 2003 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 73 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
cheers steve. well it looks like i've got some fun ahead of me. sadly it's a berkshire site though! lol
|
|
Post Reply | Page 123 6> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |