| Posted: 15 May 2005 at 7:35pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Right
I would say that it not just marsh frogs that impact on common frogs - take for instance the humble smooth newt or even the great crested newt - both of these species seem to impact greatly on common frog tadpoles -
I have had two successful spawnings over 2004 and 2005 I had a good hatch of tadpoles but all were gone within a few weeks as the smooth newts move into my small garden pond.
We have a thriving marsh frog population in Essex - Hadleigh Castle Country Park - They are really occupying an empty niche - yet we also have a very low Common frog population - which may always have been low - yet a few hundred yards up the hill in back gardens we have a thriving common frog population!
I have seen massive declines of Common frogs over the Essex countryside without the presence of Marsh Frogs - in fact many countryside ponds are not actively managed - there are fewer water meadows providing the temporary ponds/waterbodies which Common Frogs need to breed - rather than blame the marsh frog maybe we need to look at the changes in habitats - which seem to benefit Marsh Frogs and not our native common frog. If we can balance the needs of both As you say they coexist in Europe -
In gardens of course there tends to be an increase in Common frog populations - I have noticed that my pond was colonised by common frogs two years after it was built - in 2004 -
I can also report that grass snakes in Hadleigh are doing rather well feeding on the Marsh Frogs, while the herons, little egrets are also feeding on them - not to mention the amount of food available to aquatic inverts - feeding on the tadpoles (MF) water beetles and their larva plus many other species possibly feed on marsh frog tadpoles -
I am getting fed up with these 'scapegoats' which we find to cover our misuse of our natural resources etc etc. I do find the issue interesting and I enjoy monitoring the occurence of marsh frogs in Essex - they are still spreading - with the help of humans - we have removed a small population from Davy Down Country Park while they have also manged to get into Rainham Marshes - The RSPB are worried about the effects on crested newts - yet they do not seem to have any effect on crested newts - apart from provide yet another food source (possibly)
The rangers at Hadleigh were concerned that the marsh frogs were eating all the aquatic inverts in their pond dipping ditch/platform - they must have eaten them all - when you look at other factors - introduction of fish (sticklebacks) the 20 times a year pond dipping sessions you can see other factors that have caused a decline.
The Marsh Frog has been reported as benefiting several species - grass snake, medicinal leech, grey heron, little egret and of course the Bittern.
It would be good to look at predator prey relationships within our studies - I fail to see why grass snakes would decline due to marsh frogs - perhaps they were cane toads?
It is often the case that grass snakes eat all the fish in a garden pond - yet it was most likely to be the neighbours cat or the Grey Heron -
The paper on canterbury grass snakes suggests that the artificially high numbers of snakes - by feeding on marsh frogs may also harm our native amphibians????? errrr
Regards
Jon
|