the online meeting place for all who love our amphibians and reptiles |
|
First real field test with Nikon 105mm F/2.8D. |
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Author | |
Testudo Man
Senior Member Joined: 11 Apr 2012 Location: Kent Status: Offline Points: 91 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It sounds like we are both "singing from the same Hymn book" Will. A shallow/blurred DOF is my preference too, but not to the extent of just the smallest portion of an image in focus. As you say, and others will also echo...photography, like all things in life, is totally subjective. |
|
Testudo Man
Senior Member Joined: 11 Apr 2012 Location: Kent Status: Offline Points: 91 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I much prefer honest comments, i would disregard a "WOW" comment...Im not interested in "WOW" comments I can, and do, get plenty of those on Flickr! Im a lazy photographer when it comes to camera settings. I normally just shoot in Sportsmode, letting the camera chose optimum shutter/aperture/iso etc. etc...I could get away with that using bridge cameras, and even my 70-300 Tamron zoom lens on a DSLR. Prime lenses force you to think more...dedicated macro lenses force you to get to know your manual settings more......................which can only be a good thing i guess I also only shoot in Jpeg! (shock horror)...and as for PP/editing...i use a very prehistoric Potoshop 6 ...Im such a dinosaur |
|
will
Senior Member Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1830 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
@testudo man - I'm a JPEG guy too! (partly too much of a dinosaur also I have a thing about manipulating images aside from the odd crop...) camera body was Nikon D3200 now for this season I sold my other kidney to pair the macro with Nikon D7100. So the only reason for poor photos will be the camera operator...
|
|
Testudo Man
Senior Member Joined: 11 Apr 2012 Location: Kent Status: Offline Points: 91 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi Tom, i thought i mentioned it before, that Im in Kent Not sure if you got your wires crossed? but my 105mm lens does not have VR, its the older model/lens As already said, still learning how to get the best out of this macro lens...Ive never ventured beyond F8(never really needed to before)...so still a lot to learn, in regards to potential optimum images. Available light certainly plays a part with this lens too...A few more sessions, and i should get to grips with it. But i really needed to test it in the field, in real world conditions...cant wait to try it on some butterflies too. |
|
Tom Omlette
Senior Member Joined: 07 Nov 2013 Location: Stoke on Trent Status: Offline Points: 449 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
yes you mentioned both things i just wasn't being alert!!!
definitely worth weening yourself off the modes and taking control of the camera yourself. it really does't take that much getting used to. a couple of years ago i knew next to nothing about photography now i would never trust the camera to set more appropriate settings than i could myself. in camera processing isn't as good as most post processing software either so shooting raw has advantages too. just my opinion and what works for me. impressive shots though and looking forward to seeing more. tom
|
|
Tom Omlette
Senior Member Joined: 07 Nov 2013 Location: Stoke on Trent Status: Offline Points: 449 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
@ will. if you shoot in jpeg there is still processing but the camera does it for you. i'd rather do it myself afterwards than trust the camera tbh.
traditionally all digital images have been a little soft and absolutely require a bit of sharpening under all circumstances. however, your d7100 is one of the first to have to antialiasing filter removed from the sensor which has apparently improved sharpness straight out of the camera. a little sharpening may still be required though. noise reduction is also more effective post rather than in camera and that can be important. tom
|
|
will
Senior Member Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1830 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks Tim, appreciate your advice as always- it's probably laziness on my part to let the camera do the processing with JPEG rather than me doing it with RAW...
|
|
GemmaJF
Admin Group Joined: 25 Jan 2003 Location: Essex Status: Offline Points: 4359 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It was starting out with macro photography that got me off the auto-settings and into using RAW, DOF again, darker pictures for increased DOF were easier to rescue in post processing when shot in RAW. Got a bit lazy of late, use the macro more as a portrait lens and shoot 90% in JPEG - I might make an effort this year to get back into 'taking control' and exploring macro again. I get a real buzz out of watching peoples photography exploits on the forum |
|
Testudo Man
Senior Member Joined: 11 Apr 2012 Location: Kent Status: Offline Points: 91 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I did a test some years ago, shot both Raw an Jpeg images of a common lizard. I edited both types of files(as i normally would) resized down to my normal file sizes, that i upload on the Web/Net. Compared them side by side for images quality, and i struggled to choose which type of file/image was best. Thats not to say that they are the same, i would agree that RAW files are superior, but it all depends what you choose to do with your final images. Once again Will, you have almost travelled the same path as me with your Nikon bodies. Your D7100 is not that far off of a FF D600, so you have a great camera there mate |
|
Testudo Man
Senior Member Joined: 11 Apr 2012 Location: Kent Status: Offline Points: 91 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Sports mode for me, works well in most situations, for my chosen subjects. As you know with wild life, you come across it, then you have a small window in time to capture some decent shots, before the creature runs/flys/slithered off!!...So once i have shot several record/decent shots of a subject, i then put the camera into manual/aperture mode, and finish off shooting pics of the subject, using various settings. I agree with you, manual mode is better, get to know your camera and its optimum settings, and utilize what works best for you. Its definitely all about experimenting, until you find the right settings, for the right situations. As I mentioned in Wills post, i know Raw files are superior to Jpeg files. In fact, I shot some side by side images late last year, of a female adder(using my Nikon D7000) to once again compare Raw against Jpeg. I just have to get around to spending some time, sorting through those images, post processing/editing them, and comparing the outcome. Personally for me, since i have never printed any of my my images, shown any of them as full size files, Jpeg works for my current needs. If i should to choose to print images, or show large full size files, then i would spend that extra time it takes, and edit my images in Raw, because that would be the best option in that situation. |
|
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |