Link
Link
Link
Link
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
|
Beavers
NARRS 2007: First results are in
|
©
Herpetological Conservation Trust |
|
As the
National Amphibian and Reptile Recording Scheme (NARRS) celebrates the
completion of its first year of surveys, the Herpetological Conservation
Trust has released its initial report on the year’s results.
Support
for the scheme was high, with up to 1,000 volunteers attending training
days. Around 150 amphibian and 110 reptile survey reports were submitted,
covering a total of 163 officially designated sites, each 1 km square,
with most volunteers surveying the same square for both reptiles and
amphibians. The HCT report notes that this number approaches the number of
sites surveyed annually in the established National Bat Monitoring
Program, which has now been running for a decade. The report expresses
optimism that, as NARRS develops over the coming years, the number of
sites included in annual surveys is likely to increase.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographically,
the survey covered most of Britain, and included areas that traditionally
have little representation in local Amphibian and Reptile Groups in
Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man (see maps).
The preliminary
findings reveal that reptiles were present in 53% of survey squares and
amphibians in 75%. The HCT report cautions that these high rates of
occupancy may reflect bias in the way sites were surveyed, possibly due to
a tendency for surveyors to select squares more likely to hold target
species. However, NARRS adopts a standardised protocol for selecting
amphibian survey sites within each square, and this is expected to have
reduced bias in the amphibian results compared with those from the reptile
survey.
|
|
|
|
|
|
©
Herpetological Conservation Trust |
|
Measured
by occupancy rate, the most widespread species encountered were common
frog (found in 56% of sites surveyed for amphibians), palmate newt (30%)
and common lizard (27%). Slow worms, common toads and smooth newts were
identified from 21% of sites surveyed for reptiles and amphibians
respectively. A further 8% of sites yielded newt records that couldn’t
reliably be identified to species (smooth or palmate). The rarest species
encountered during the survey was the marsh frog (1 record from 150
amphibian surveys), although this exotic is not a NARRS target species.
Adders and great crested newts were found in only 8% of squares included
in the relevant survey. Smooth snake, sand lizard and natterjack toad were
not included in the survey, which focused on widespread species.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
full report is available for download from www.narrs.org.uk.
As the preliminary findings of the first year of surveys, the report
cautions that it would be premature to consider these results indicative
of the status of British reptiles and amphibians, or to try and identify
trends based on comparisons with past studies. However, while the
implications of the first year's findings may be unclear at this stage,
the level of public support for the program is encouraging. Equally
importantly, these results represent a successful test of NARRS’ broad
methodology and identify potential areas of bias that future surveys can
address.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Send us your
records!
Records are
essential to the conservation of the UK's Reptiles &
Amphibians
A record is a description of WHAT was seen, WHEN it was seen and
WHERE. It is also useful to know WHO saw the animal so that we can follow up
reports of endangered species and verify records.
- WHAT: The species observed, whether it was an adult, juvenile,
larva or egg and how many
- WHEN: The date and time of your sighting
- WHERE: A GB grid reference or a post code if the animal was
spotted in your garden, it is also useful to know the nearest town and the name
of the site such as your local nature reserve
- WHO: Who made the observation
|
Reptiles & Amphibians of the UK have provided an on-line
submission form to make the process of telling us about what you have seen as
straightforward as possible. The form requires a valid email address as our
reference of who submitted the record.
On-line records submission form |